The Art of Negotiation: How Top Economists Always Get What They Want

NO

 

These two words. How impactful can these two words be? Think back to the time when someone said “NO” to you, in any form. Imagine going through the torment of getting a job interview only for your application to be rejected, or getting a deferred letter from your university. Try to picture a world where an important client decides to cancel your deal. Was the price too high? Envision oneself having their hopes dashed because the vision they ideated gets turned down, or for something as simple as a discount that they were certain to get, being refused, and the answer is a resounding rejection. As human beings, we tend to overly dwell on the - NO. 

The blame for rejection is either placed on bad timing, the economy, luck or even oneself. But seldom do any of us reflect on what exactly takes place psychologically when we hear the word ‘No’.

When an individual thinks in that regard, that's when overthinking and blaming end, and this is where negotiation begins. The psychology behind no is often more telling than the answer itself. A NO often indicates that the other party either feels inadequate or neglected. In this context, people argue over the sub-genres of negotiation, selecting split, interest-based, integrative and positional.

Whether it is getting that ever-important college admission, cinching a business deal, or striking a bargain, one’s success hinges on the dynamics of invoking, guiding, and commanding dialogue.

Whether it is eminent economists, lawyers, diplomats, or even military strategists, sheer powerful weapons defeat intelligent and precise framing, strategy and psychological depth. Yes, psychological depth. Negotiation is often associated with the higher reaches of society, used by politicians, world leaders, company officers, used for striking peace, war deals, manipulating economic markets, or unfathomable million-dollar deals. But negotiation, in my opinion, is a trick that should be a common skill, and can be used and learned by anyone. Need a discount?- Negotiate, Want to bargain on your salary?- Negotiate, want your vision to be recognised?- Negotiate. Want to be a better version of yourself?- Negotiate.

But? How does one learn the art of negotiation? Humans are not mind-readers. How does one use psychology and economic patterns to strike the best deal? How does one understand the basic core rules of Negotiation? The main thing out of all how can YOU turn a "no" to a unanimous "Yes"
With maximum credibility, the blog intends to aid you in turning rejection into acceptance, and think like an economist, using the five straightforward tactics, which have proven results in our daily lives:

1) Play For A Draw, Not For A Win

One common misconception that many negotiators may have is that they need to "win" and overpower the counterparty. They feel a need to be in a better position than the counterparty. But this is a very widespread misconception. What a negotiator must remember is that they are at a negotiating table (either professionally, or a simple bargain with a fruit vendor), and not in a war room, where diplomats fight for dominance. Negotiating does NOT correlate to dominance. Think of negotiation as a chess game- don't play for a win, but play for a draw. What does "draw" exactly mean here? Why not win? The one thing that both parties on the negotiation table should realise is that they are here to find a mutually satisfying and wholesome agreement, rather than to "force" or subdue the other party. The main aim of negotiation is finding equal ground, not trying to be the king of the hill. If one presents demands that are heavily one-sided, they may not find the opposing party eager to agree to their terms, as they are unfavourable to them. The main aim to break this barrier is to present your deal in such a way that it may seem favourable not only to you but also to them. 

For example, ask them- "He,y I would like to get a discount, can we work around it? This would really help me buy more goods from you in large quantities, or consider you over other suppliers.

In the above example, if you just ask for a discount, this will result in an "unfavourable" condition for both parties- apparently, you have framed a REQUEST, not a NEGOTIATION. Negotiation is when both parties benefit. By emphasising what they can receive in exchange for a "discount" in the current example, it makes them more eager to go through or present a counter-offer, as you framed your negotiation offer to not only benefit you but also your counterparty. Hence, in conclusion, play for a draw, not for a win- you are negotiating, not begging or requesting. 

2.) The Triple Y trick

Now, more popularly called the “Yes Ladder,” this technique was formulated by psychologists Jonathan Freedman and Scott Fraser back in the 1960s. Constructed from a potent principle of behavioural psychology: individuals are more willing to accept a big request if they’ve previously agreed to a series of smaller, more manageable ones. This comes across as simple, yet has transformed the fields of psychology, sales, diplomacy, marketing, and even behavioural economics.

 

What lies at the foundation of this? Their answers: consistency bias. People work hard to ensure their actions align with their past decisions. When someone agrees to several propositions, endorsed “yes-es”, especially to actions that would benefit them, they subconsciously feel the need to keep agreeing in order to maintain the direction they’re headed towards. The number is usually Yes. Ask for a small request, if agreed, climb higher, ask for an even larger request, flatter them in between, then climb higher, till you reach the third ladder. After that, statically you have a better chance of getting an acceptance

In negotiation, this is meant to warm up the counterparty’s brain into becoming more agreeable. You could start with acknowledging goals, confirming shared interests, or giving minor benefits. These low-stakes yes’s create a pattern that steps deeper into the ‘yes’ zone. Each yes in return grants a slight boost of dopamine, the so-called feel-good and motivation neurotransmitter. As the emotionally steered negotiation progresses, the other party usually "accepts" your offer. So what one can conclude from this is that you should not be impatient, and jump to huge requests. Try to set a pattern of approval and an air of security. If you are unsure, try for a higher number of "Yes", expand the ladder, however, the general and safer norm is three "Yes" in a row. 

Let’s consider a freelancer negotiating a higher payment from a long-term client.

Ladder 1 – A small, agreeable request
“Would you agree that the quality of work I’ve delivered has consistently met your expectations?”
This is a low-effort question that most clients would comfortably say “yes” to, especially if the track record is strong.

Ladder 2 – A slightly more engaging follow-up
“And would you say that my ability to meet deadlines and adapt to feedback has made the process more efficient on your end?”
This reinforces reliability and builds positive momentum.

Ladder 3 – A value-based agreement
“So, considering the value I bring, wouldn’t it be fair to say that this collaboration benefits both of us?”
This encourages the client to affirm mutual benefit, further solidifying the cooperative tone of the discussion.

Final Ask – The actual proposal
“In that case, I’d like to propose revising the compensation slightly to better reflect the time, consistency, and quality involved. Would that be something you’d consider?”

 

At this point, the client has already agreed with three positive, non-threatening statements. Psychologically, they are now more inclined to maintain consistency and are more open to accepting the final request.

3) Let the Counterparty come to YOU:

The negotiation process is both tactical and psychological in nature. It embodies the interplay of feelings, impressions, and the intricate schema of authority and control beneath the layers of digits, contracts, and data. A hardworking negotiator must mould their maintenance strategy according to the negotiation's subject matter and context. One of the most strategic but neglected considerations is the psychological edge gained from "conducting business" on the opponent's side of the playing field. That is to say, at their home ground.

Think of every new experience where you would begin a fresh role or an employment position, such as attending a new school or working in an entirely new region of a different country. That first experience everyone faces is the feeling of being lost, by being dropped into a new area. This feeling, while being natural, affects the way you feel about yourself and your decision-making capacity, and as such, this also fuels anxiety. This line of reasoning can be convincingly applied to negotiations. When the opposing or rival party comes to visit you in your territory, referred to as your office, city, or country, there is already a pre-existing sense of feeling that does not equate to power, which is disadvantageous.

You, on the other hand, are in your element: you know the space, the people, the customs, and the flow of events. This breed places a lot of calm and self-assurance into the hands of the negotiator, easing them into the process. 

By hosting the opposite party on your terms and in your environment, you seem in control. This sets a tone for the rest of the meeting. The counterparty feels unfamiliar in the environment; their nerves may lead them to a quicker acceptance. They seem out of control, while you seem dominant. This may not make a huge difference when the negotiator is experienced, but a "play of nerves" allows you to get a slightly favourable deal. This is why most peace treaties, throughout history, to economic deals signed in the so-called "victor's" country, or environment. 

"The best battles are won before they’re fought—by choosing the terrain."
– Sun Tzu, The Art of War

This psychological leverage is powerful because human beings are wired to seek safety and familiarity. Being outside one's comfort zone triggers stress responses, which can affect focus and negotiation strength. By contrast, the host negotiator is calm, composed, and appears dominant simply by the setting. One must constantly press the counterparty, especially when at a disadvantage or unfavourable term of negotiation term, small things like an unfamiliar environment also matter. 

4)  Middle Price Technique: Inflation and Deflation

This trick basically involves giving an "illusion or perception of choice." Let’s start at the beginning- you put forward an unreasonable offer which is about 30 to 40 percent lower than what your actual target is (or higher, depending on context). It is not intended to be accepted, and, in fact, you want it to be rejected. This offer contributes to framing the range of discussion or providing psychological anchoring.

The counterparty who rejects your first offer is already in negotiation mode, or competitive spirit. You then put a “compromise” target, which is actually your intended offer. It now appears to be reasonable and budget-friendly rather than something outrageous. The counterpart gets the feeling of control, thinking they outsmarted the other side and secured a good deal, but in fact, you have manoeuvred them into a perfect trap.

Apart from deal-making on a broad scale, it is also one of the most commonly used strategies at a personal level. By offering two extremes, the negotiator is trying to shape the perception of the fairness spectrum when in reality,y the only option available was the option the negotiator wanted all along.

Let's take a simple example- let's assume you wish to negotiate with a vendor.

Let’s say you are window shopping at a local market, and you notice a stall where they sell scarves. Their vendor saw you and casually quoted a steep price, way more than expected. Unsurprisingly, you try to negotiate. The vendor “concedes,” lowering the price to something reasonable, but makes it seem like they are doing you a favour. What you don’t realise is that this middle price was the price they intended to sell it for all along. Because the vendor first made up a huge offer, he was able to make a psychological anchor that made the final offer seem like a lucky break. Middle price technique—create an illusion of a delicate compromise.

Hence, this is all about anchoring and artificially manipulating prices to get a deal in your ideal range, used by top economists and negotiators around the world.

5) Never Overnegotiate: Maintain Reputation 

Everything has limits, even negotiation. To get an ideal deal, do not overnegotiate. Yes, there might be situations where the counterparty may be adamant, maybe because they know what their product is worth, maybe because they are familiar with these tricks. Don't be discouraged, overnegotiation can backfire, especially if it shows the counterparty you're desperate for a specific good/service.

Keep your standards high, never beg, or show yourself in a desperate light. The market is full of ears and eyes, as one says. Maintain your reputation at all costs. Never argue in front of an adamant party; know when to stop. Stop once you have received a reasonable amount, don't go for an even better choice- that makes you look cheap and untrustworthy. Never reveal your intentions before the right time. A professional negotiator should carry himself with eloquence, build a steady reputation for future deals. Always remember the first quote- Play for a draw, never for a win. Do not get greedy.

A major thing most negotiators forget is that they should always maintain and cultivate an air of mystery and always strive for a good reputation. A "goodwill" may save you from an empty or nullified deal, may change the psychology of your counterparty, and may save deals. "Oh, (X) will be the negotiator, for this meeting, pressing our demands might be tough"

When the counterparty starts thinking like the above phrase, is when they subconsciously give in and accept "defeat" before the game even begins. 

"Henry Kissinger", the US Secretary General, mastered the Art of Negotiation, especially with his "unshakeable" negotiation policies. 

Kissinger was the Secretary of State for America once. His reputation as a statesman was so powerful that his very name could help settle disputes because parties believed he would help resolve the issues. It was suggested that ‘if a peace treaty was suggested, it was bound to happen once Kissinger’s name appeared during discussions.’ This stopped the other negotiating parties from being more assertive, because they risked looking ridiculous if they could not come to an understanding with Kissinger’s help.

 

CONCLUSION

We can conclude by saying that Negotiation is more than bargaining. It is not "begging" or "requesting." It is an intricate game of psychology, behavioural economics and satisfying terms. The above-mentioned tricks do not guarantee success, but confidence, skills, practice, and self-belief do. The above-mentioned stipulations are supplementary and conditional, based on situation to situation. Negotiation is not about forcing or threatening, but about guiding and negotiating, finding equal grounds. Respect, integrity, and transparency go a long way. Negotiation is not a "want-based skill", but a "need-based skill" nowadays.  Economists like us are negotiators, not "victors" as mentioned above. 

In the real world, the best deals are rarely about winning. They’re about aligning value, trust, and perception. Because in the end, negotiation isn't just how you get what you want — it's how you get others to want to give it to you. “What’s the smartest negotiation move you’ve ever used — or had used against you?” Answer in the comments 

More behavioural economics blogs are coming soon, once a week. 
The guide mentioned above is for educational purposes and purely situational. 
For business, advertisement and email inquiries, contact on gmail - economicspowered@gmail.com